Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gambling Regulation results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Special Pleading, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 844 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (15,476 of 16,111 topics). This Gambling Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Gambling Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 2,880
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos