Biggest supplier of video gambling machines in Missouri is pulling the plug Friday 22%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

4/8/2026, 9:38:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Pessimism Bias, and Straw Man, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 280 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.2% and a BS Rank of 22% (15,744 of 20,173 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the article peer group.

Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway said Wednesday that the state’s biggest supplier of video gambling machines is pulling out the devices later this week. 
Hanaway said Wildwood-based Torch Electronics is suspending operations of the devices, which resemble slot machines, on Friday. 
A federal judge has ruled the devices, found in bars, convenience stores and fraternal organizations, are illegal gambling machines. 
The company is in the process of appealing U.S. 
District Judge John Ross’ ruling. 
Torch Electronics spokesman Gregg Keller declined to comment Wednesday about the company’s plans for the machines. 
“Torch’s agreement to proactively halt these operations signals clearly that there has never been a gray market,” Hanaway said in a statement. 
“While this is a tremendous step forward for Missouri, our office will continue to investigate and seek enforcement action against other operators, manufacturers, and retail stores facilitating this illegal activity.” 
Hanaway is alluding to how her office and local prosecutors, including St. 
Louis County Prosecutor Melissa Price Smith, are pursuing legal action against businesses that house the machines. 
The machines have been a flashpoint in Missouri politics for years. 
The state’s casinos have fought the devices, especially since they aren’t regulated or taxed the same way. 
Defenders of the machines say they’re not gambling devices, primarily because they provide players with an option of knowing the outcome of a spin beforehand. 
And some lawmakers have sought to legalize and tax the machines, attempts that have often run into passionate opposition. 
Such bills are being considered in the current legislative session, though whether they can find a path to passage before adjournment in May is unclear. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 8.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect10.7%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias8.9%This article: 6.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 6.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 8.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man8.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization7.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 10.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination10.7%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

280 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech228writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCatherine Hanaway • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCatherine Hanaway • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Catherine Hanaway

100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words100% of attributed speech38% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Indoctrination+57.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Catherine Hanaway: 57.7%57.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.