Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gambia results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 311 hits. Analysis detected 2,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,854 topics). This Gambia is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gambia
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos