Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Future Of The Us results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 640 hits . Analysis detected 2,682 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,471 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Future Of The Us is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Future Of The Us
Topic details
Total words: 3,471
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst