Topic summary
⁠75%3 analyzed articles/videos1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Of Technology results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 782 hits. Analysis detected 5,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,510 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,636 of 16,562 topics). This Future Of Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Future Of Technology
Topic details
Total words: 3,510
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 22.3%22.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos