Topic summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos2,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Of Gaming results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,491 hits. Analysis detected 9,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,604 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,677 of 16,558 topics). This Future Of Gaming is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Future Of Gaming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,604
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.4%17.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.6%19.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos