Topic summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos1,067 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fusion Power results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 1,248 hits. Analysis detected 7,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,729 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,782 of 16,562 topics). This Fusion Power is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Fusion Power
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,729
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
6.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 33.5%33.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.1%32.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.6%12.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.1%8.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 33.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos