Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,772 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fruit Pies results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 3,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ā 15% (14,164 of 16,562 topics). This Fruit Pies is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Fruit Pies
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 15%Fruit Pies (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos