Topic summary
36% 2 analyzed articles/videos 900 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Friends results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 953 hits . Analysis detected 4,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,657 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (16,033 of 16,356 topics). This Friends is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Friends
Topic details
Total words: 11,657
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst