Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These French Foreign Policy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 1,128 hits. Analysis detected 5,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,057 of 16,562 topics). This French Foreign Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
French Foreign Policy
Topic details
Total words: 3,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.5%32.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.1%23.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.7%10.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos