Topic summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These French results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 145 hits . Analysis detected 981 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,419 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,301 of 15,447 topics). This French is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. French
Topic details
Total words: 1,419
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst