Topic summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fraudulent Activity results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 455 hits. Analysis detected 2,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,455 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (10,742 of 15,447 topics). This Fraudulent Activity is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Fraudulent Activity
Topic details
Total words: 4,455
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos