Topic summary
⁠16%2 analyzed articles/videos519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Gehry results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,426 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,220 of 16,562 topics). This Frank Gehry is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Frank Gehry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,426
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos