Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Franchises results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 795 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,476 of 16,562 topics). This Franchises is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Franchises
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos