Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video963 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Franchise Analysis results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 1,166 hits. Analysis detected 4,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,889 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,271 of 16,562 topics). This Franchise Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Franchise Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 2,889
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 40.4%40.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 40.4%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos