Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Founding Documents results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 2,352 hits . Analysis detected 10,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,860 of 16,562 topics). This Founding Documents is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Founding Documents
Topic details
Total words: 13,320
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst