Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video2,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foster Care Savings Accounts results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 325 hits. Analysis detected 3,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,737 of 16,562 topics). This Foster Care Savings Accounts is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Foster Care Savings Accounts
Topic details
Total words: 6,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos