Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,055 of 16,562 topics). This Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Fossil Fuel Industry Accountability
Topic details
Total words: 2,742
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos