Topic summary
23% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Formula 1 results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 3,485 hits . Analysis detected 18,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,557 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,223 of 16,562 topics). This Formula 1 is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Formula 1
Topic details
Total words: 23,557
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst