Topic summary
⁠25%5 analyzed articles/videos3,422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Politics & Elections results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 2,537 hits. Analysis detected 21,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,014 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,614 of 16,558 topics). This Foreign Politics & Elections is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Foreign Politics & Elections
Topic details
Total words: 34,014
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles34K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos