Topic summary
⁠29%3 analyzed articles/videos505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Influence Operations results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 2,112 hits. Analysis detected 17,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,381 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (13,365 of 15,491 topics). This Foreign Influence Operations is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Foreign Influence Operations
Topic details
Total words: 22,381
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles22.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos