Topic summary
⁠53%5 analyzed articles/videos752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Exchange results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 4,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,972 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,296 of 16,097 topics). This Foreign Exchange is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Foreign Exchange
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,972
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos