Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Food Recalls results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 3,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,361 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,758 topics). This Food Recalls is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Food Recalls
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,361
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos