Topic summary
â 0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food History results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and In-Group Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,912 hits . Analysis detected 13,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,300 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of â 7% (15,444 of 16,562 topics). This Food History is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Food History
Topic details
Total words: 19,300
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst