Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Food Festivals results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 1,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,383 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Food Festivals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Food Festivals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,383
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos