Topic summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food And Beverage Industry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 3,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,522 of 16,562 topics). This Food And Beverage Industry is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Food And Beverage Industry
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠31%Food And Beverage Industry (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,301
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos