Topic summary
⁠41%2 analyzed articles/videos1,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food And Beverage results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 777 hits. Analysis detected 4,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,586 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,981 of 16,562 topics). This Food And Beverage is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Food And Beverage
Topic details
Total words: 6,586
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos