Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Aid results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 660 hits. Analysis detected 5,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,030 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,787 of 16,562 topics). This Food Aid is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Food Aid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,030
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.8%19.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.8%21.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos