Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Access results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54.4% saturation with 588 hits. Analysis detected 2,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,234 of 15,492 topics). This Food Access is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Food Access
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.0% percentile
10.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 54.4%54.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 32.7%32.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.7%18.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 20.4%20.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 12.0%12.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.6%19.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 54.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos