Topic summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 254 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Folding Phones results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 3,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,160 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,267 of 16,562 topics). This Folding Phones is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Folding Phones
Topic details
Total words: 2,160
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.2% percentile 4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst