Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flooding Resources results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 310 faulty-reasoning hits from 213 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (567 of 16,562 topics). This Flooding Resources is worse (more manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Flooding Resources
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 213
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.6% percentile
14.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles213 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 36.6%36.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.4%25.4%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 10.3%10.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Topic 36.6%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos