Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Flooding Forecast results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 894 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,979 of 16,562 topics). This Flooding Forecast is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Flooding Forecast
Topic details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos