Considerable to catastrophic flooding likely through Thursday in Texas, forecasters say 6%

By Emily Foxhall5% Ayden Runnels5%

7/14/2026, 10:48:52 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 516 faulty-reasoning hits from 739 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of 6% (20,651 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the article peer group.

Considerable to catastrophic flooding is likely to occur over the next two days in places along the U.S. 90 corridor west of San Antonio, according to federal forecasters, who elevated the risk for heavy rain causing flash flooding to the highest possible level through Thursday morning. 
Some places could see a staggering 10 to 20 inches of rain, raising particular concerns among National Weather Service forecasters for people vacationing there and who might not be familiar with the flash flood threat. 
The areas at greatest expected risk included all or parts of Medina, Frio, Uvalde, Kinney, Maverick, Zavala, Val Verde, Edwards, Real and Bandera counties. 
The Pecos, Rio Grande, Nueces, Frio, Medina and San Antonio rivers could all flood, forecasters said. 
And areas outside of the worst forecast still faced a possible 2 to 6 inches of rain, including Kerr County. 
The city of Kerrville Police Department on Monday night and Tuesday said it already barricaded some roadways because of high water. 
The warnings arrived barely more than one year after flash flooding killed 119 people in Kerr County on the July 4 holiday, when many children were attending summer camp and families packed RV parks and vacation homes. 
Residents continue to feel intense anxiety when it rains and were watching the forecasts. 
Weather experts after last summer’s flood cautioned that it is impossible to predict precisely and with certainty where the heaviest rain might fall. 
That’s why people need to have a way to receive weather warnings and be aware of how they might need to act. 
State legislators have since required certain areas prone to flash-flooding to install warning sirens, a process that is ongoing. 
The state also mandated new safety standards at youth camps, but it took no action on other recommendations such as standardizing training for local emergency management coordinators. 
Gov. 
Greg Abbott midday Tuesday issued a disaster declaration for 59 counties in recognition of the threat to make resources available. 
“Texas is positioned to respond quickly and effectively,” Abbott said in a statement. 
“I urge all Texans in affected areas to monitor local weather forecasts, avoid driving through flooded roadways, and have emergency supplies ready.” 
Storms had already dropped more than 10 inches of rain north of Uvalde as of Tuesday, with more heavy rain also falling in parts of Medina, Bandera and Kerr Counties, according to the National Weather Service Austin and San Antonio Office. 
The Uvalde County Sheriff’s Office on Tuesday was urging people to stay home and reporting on roadways that had flooded. 
Bandera and Medina County also reported multiple road closures, including on U.S. 
90. 
Forecasters expected a lull in storm activity before it ramped up again overnight Tuesday into Wednesday morning. 
“All areas are kind of saturated now across the Rio Grande, Edwards Plateau and in portions of the western Hill Country and U.S. 90 corridor,” forecaster Jason Runyen said at an afternoon webinar. 
“Any additional heavy rainfall that occurs is going to run off very, very quickly.” 
New flash flood warnings issued in Hill Country counties 
July 14, 2026, 7:45 p.m. 
The National Weather Service issued a flash flood warning for parts of Comal, Kendall and Bexar counties on Tuesday evening as rainfall was expected to worsen through the night. 
The areas affected include San Antonio International Airport and the Guadalupe River State Park, where NWS warned that “life-threatening” flash flooding was expected or potentially already underway. 
The warning was issued at 6:20 p.m. and is in effect until 11:15 p.m. but may be extended. 
A portion of Bexar County north of San Antonio was also placed under a brief tornado warning by the NWS that expired at 7:15 p.m. 
The new warning adds to two already issued flash flood warnings covering most of Uvalde and Medina counties, scheduled until midnight Wednesday. 
The City of Uvalde opened a temporary community shelter Tuesday afternoon for those who could potentially be affected by the flooding. 
In Edwards County north of Uvalde, the sheriff’s office posted photos of roadways already flooded midday Tuesday, and CNN drone footage of Sabinal showed roads completely covered by the rainfall. 
Several counties in the affected regions under an NWS flood watch announced road closures in preparation for any flooding occurring through the evening. 
Texas Game Wardens reported several swiftwater rescues earlier in the day in several South Texas counties including Uvalde. 
 Ayden Runnels 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.3%The Texas Tribune: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.3%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Emily Foxhall: 2.7%The Texas Tribune: 2.9%Availability Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.3%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 1.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Emily Foxhall: 1.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 2.1%The Texas Tribune: 4.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.4%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.7%Emily Foxhall: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 1.2%The Texas Tribune: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.9%The Texas Tribune: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%Emily Foxhall: 9.4%The Texas Tribune: 7.7%Negativity Bias15.3%This article: 1.8%Emily Foxhall: 0.5%The Texas Tribune: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.3%The Texas Tribune: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.6%The Texas Tribune: 1.1%Recency Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 3.2%The Texas Tribune: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.6%The Texas Tribune: 2.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.3%Emily Foxhall: 1.3%The Texas Tribune: 5.0%Appeal to Emotion15.3%This article: 3.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Begging the Question3.0%This article: 5.0%Emily Foxhall: 1.0%The Texas Tribune: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.7%The Texas Tribune: 1.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.3%The Texas Tribune: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.3%The Texas Tribune: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.2%Emily Foxhall: 0.2%The Texas Tribune: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice6.2%This article: 8.7%Emily Foxhall: 1.4%The Texas Tribune: 1.0%Indoctrination8.7%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.0%The Texas Tribune: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Emily Foxhall: 0.1%The Texas Tribune: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

739 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers38%attributed speech457writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKerrville Police Department • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Abbott • 22 words • 100.0% coverageNational Weather Service Austin and San Antonio Office • 41 words • 0.0% coverageUvalde County Sheriff’s Office • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJason Runyen • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJason Runyen • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 29 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCity of Uvalde • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTexas Game Wardens • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAyden Runnels • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words7.1% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+95.2 ptsWriter: 4.8%Uvalde County Sheriff’s Office: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.1 ptsWriter: 10.1%Uvalde County Sheriff’s Office: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.