Topic summary
⁠15%2 analyzed articles/videos2,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fitness Trackers results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 4,802 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (14,898 of 16,562 topics). This Fitness Trackers is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Fitness Trackers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,672
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
025507510010.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos