Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fitness Technology results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 2,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Fitness Technology is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fitness Technology
Topic details
Total words: 1,332
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 34.8%34.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 36.3%36.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.8%18.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.9%16.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 34.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.5%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos