Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These First Nations results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 73 hits . Analysis detected 318 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,318 of 16,559 topics). This First Nations is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. First Nations
Topic details
Total words: 496
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.0% percentile 7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles496 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst