Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fired results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,133 of 16,562 topics). This Fired is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Fired
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠57%Fired (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos