Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fire Risk results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 453 hits. Analysis detected 3,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,924 of 15,911 topics). This Fire Risk is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Fire Risk
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.0%10.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos