Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasmine Garland results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 453 hits . Analysis detected 3,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,641 of 6,628 authors). This Jasmine Garland is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Jasmine Garland
Author details
Total words: 4,484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst