Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fire Prevention results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 331 hits . Analysis detected 1,607 faulty-reasoning hits from 978 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,785 of 16,562 topics). This Fire Prevention is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Fire Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 978
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.2% percentile 8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles978 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 25.1% 25.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 33.8% 33.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 33.8%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst