Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Financials results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 420 hits . Analysis detected 1,630 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Financials is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Financials
Topic details
Total words: 1,407
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 29.9% 29.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.2% 24.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst