Topic summary
ā 92% 1 analyzed article/video 265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Ruin results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 154 hits . Analysis detected 946 faulty-reasoning hits from 795 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ā 79% (3,479 of 16,503 topics). This Financial Ruin is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Financial Ruin
Topic details
Total words: 795
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.9% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles795 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 19.0% 19.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst