Author summary
ā 93% 1 analyzed article/video 265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valentina Martinez results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 154 hits . Analysis detected 946 faulty-reasoning hits from 795 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ā 85% (943 of 6,204 authors). This Valentina Martinez is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Valentina Martinez
Author details
Total words: 795
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.8% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles795 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 19.0% 19.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.6% 10.6% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 19.0%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst