Topic summary
36%2 analyzed articles/videos1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Reporting results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 643 hits. Analysis detected 6,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,827 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,487 of 16,562 topics). This Financial Reporting is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Financial Reporting
Topic details
Total words: 6,827
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate