Topic summary
⁠76%3 analyzed articles/videos1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Performance results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 5,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,546 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,173 of 16,266 topics). This Financial Performance is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Financial Performance
Topic details
Total words: 6,546
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos