Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Filmmaking Techniques results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 2,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Filmmaking Techniques is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Filmmaking Techniques
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Filmmaking Techniques (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,950
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos