Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Film Interpretation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 504 hits . Analysis detected 2,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,986 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Film Interpretation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Film Interpretation
Topic details
Total words: 2,986
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst