Topic summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fifa Regulations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,552 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,514 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,849 of 16,562 topics). This Fifa Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Fifa Regulations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠47%Fifa Regulations (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,514
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos