Topic summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fifa Investigation results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 225 hits . Analysis detected 883 faulty-reasoning hits from 984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,240 of 15,769 topics). This Fifa Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Fifa Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 984
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.5% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles984 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 22.9% 22.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst