Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Festival Cancellations results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 472 hits. Analysis detected 4,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,643 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,286 of 16,562 topics). This Festival Cancellations is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Festival Cancellations
Topic details
Total words: 2,643
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.4%13.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Tu Quoque: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos